Could you tell that I’ve lost my passion for live blogging? I’d forgotten to even write about Ed until this morning. :)
But I do have several things to offer.
Finally, I’d like to summarize my reaction to Ed’s super fast talking.
The gist of it all was that, yes, we will have denominations, but what they will look like has yet to be determined. Nevertheless, churches naturally will find each other and will work together if they have a passion for the Great Commission.
Still, there are benefits and burdens that go along with denominations. The burdens center around our tendency to focus on the mechanisms of our cooperation rather than our common calling.
The benefits are many and, quite frankly, are both obvious and listed in the above links.
What most struck me about the message was the forceful tone he took calling for cooperation. This might not surprise you, but what might surprise you is that, at one point, Ed suggested that if certain people can’t get along with the rest of us, insist on attempting to run everyone else out or force us to conform, then THEY should leave the convention.
The people about whom he was speaking were obvious to the engaged SBC observer and even to the more disengaged former SBC blogger, like myself.
In terms of pointed rhetoric, Ed was somewhere between his usual provocativity and Marty Duren from back in the old days. On the SBC spectrum of “lighting it up,” if Micah Fries is a 1 (humbly opinioned) and Ben Cole is a 10 (Shock & Awe), Ed normally resides in the middle at a happy 5. I’d have to say that last night, Ed jumped up to 8 on a few occasions, which was kind of fun.
Especially because I agreed with him.
Had he been talking more about me (and he did from time to time) I might not have enjoyed it as much.