The relationship between church and school shifts
Oct 30, 2007 in Church, Missional
Got your attention? I couldn’t decide if that title would catch your eye or bore you to death. Well, this is just the prolegomena anyway. Still, it must be done. And it’s interesting.
The most captivating, motivating, cage rattling and heart crushing statistic that I have heard in the last 40 years (and I’ve heard many - especially in the last 5) is the one Reggie McNeal quoted from Thom Rainer: “Less than 10% of Bridgers/Millenials/Gen Y have any connection to church.” I assume this is talking about the church in America, since Christianity in the East is exploding at a phenomenal rate.
Laying aside all of the detailed extrapolations of what that might mean, the most simple understanding is that we have completely failed to pass on the faith to the next generation - and they are just fine with it.
The most simple response is that we must do something different or the church in America is going to go the way of the church in western Europe or even the church in Australia, which is, believe it or not, in worse shape. Note the similarity of these declining behemoths. They are all Western Culture - abandoning church like rats fleeing a sinking ship.
So what must we do different? Well, who hasn’t answered that question?
Rather than give you yet another stab at explaining the Missional church - America’s conservative attempt to make the shift to a living, healthy model for a new century - I thought I would call your attention to the Education Crises in America.
Actually, I don’t want to spend time convincing you that there is a crises in the education system in America, but what educators are doing to address it, in hopes that there might be something that we can glean from them. It so happens, I am married to a burgeoning expert in education, who is finishing her Masters and has been wooed to pursue her Doctorate by the faculty of OU’s Education Department. She’s a smarty.
I find it interesting, by the way, that evangelical Christians have absolutely no problem decrying the failure of our school systems to relate in a positive way to our nations kids, but look at similar problems within the church and see the church as pristine in the process of failure. It is merely the culture that won’t listen and obey the edicts of the church.
School violence? “The church doesn’t have the bullying and abuse that goes on in the schools,” you might say. I would respond that the reason is not that the church is doing all that great at resolving violence, but that church is optional, while school is not, and most kids are opting out of church, particularly the kids that live in a violent context.
The problem with violence in schools, and most other problems, is, actually, the problem with culture. Look at the schools with the most violence. What kind of culture do those kids live in from day to day? It is not that the school has failed them, it is that the culture has made them. Yes, I think the problem is with culture, but I don’t think that the solution is merely to proclaim that cuture should conform and stand perplexed while it flows more quickly down the drain.
Look, too, at the schools that are high performing, low violence, high graduation rate institutions. Then look at the culture of the kids that are going there. They live in homes where academics are a high priority, where two parent homes are the norm and money is not an issue - in fact the wealthier the district, the better they perform.
Don’t believe me? Check out some statistics at greatschools.net. Look at the schools around you that you know and then look at their statistics. I’m not even listing examples, because they hold true almost across the board. You pick your own.
What schools are the exception to the rule, though?
The schools that are taking kids with a low performance culture and turning them into high performance students are schools that are change agents within the culture. They are able to shape the culture around them to literally shape the homes of the students.
My wife suggested to the school in which she served in Kentucky that the teachers make visits to the homes of their students in an effort to connect and partner with parents to develop the kids as students. Even though it was a standout school that was already way outperforming its culture (and reshaping it), the general response was that they had their own lives to attend to and they weren’t interested in spending the time to make that difference.
Sound familiar? Come to us. We are the institution. You come to us and do what we say and all will be well.
By the way, the paragraph before last is not an argument for home visits in churches. Rather it is an observation that if kids are going to excel, the best way that can happen is if it is highly valued in the home. The degree to which the church can partner with parents to create a strong Christian culture in the home (outside the walls of the church!) the closer we will have come to turning that corner.
The big debate in education right now is how they (the schools) are going to shift from a traditional model of academic instruction that is proving to be increasingly ineffective to a more effective model that meets students where they are and leads them where they need to be.
The parallels are obvious, if not exact.
Next, I am going to post a paper my wife wrote on the theory of shifting that I think will spark a few ideas. It’s about education, but I obviously think there are some very relevant thoughts.
What do you think so far?






“thanks for the drink”
“you wear it now”
Old Cowboy
You wear it now
Thanks for the drink

