It has been some time since my last installment of this series. As a result, some may not remember what we were talking about when last we spoke. If you would like to review, you may click on these links:
The Organic Revolution, Pt. 1
The Organic Revolution, Pt. 2
There is a difference in politics and influence. For me and for the purposes of this series of posts, at least, politics is about maneuvering people to gain personal benefit and influence is the standing for what is right, regardless of the personal cost. So, we are considering opposites, here.
In essence, my use of the word “politics” rotates around a selfish motive and manipulative action. Politics lend themselves to an “ends justifies the means” world view that is completely foreign to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. “Influence,” however, seeks to lead according convictions - preferably convictions based on God’s Word, held as Inerrant and Sufficient. Influence is not sought, but given to one when others see their lives, hear their words and are changed by the stature of their character.
A generation of Missional minded leaders are growing up. They are growing up in our churches. They are Southern Baptists for many reasons, but for most of them, it is because they were raised in the SBC. And they love it. I grew up in the SBC. I love it.
As with any group of people, some are politicians and some are influential. Some are observing. Some are leaving.
Stop. Don’t check out on me here. This post is not about the people who are leaving because they are fed up. In fact, it is just the opposite. It is about those who are staying. I just can’t ignore that one of the options many are taking is to leave. But we are done talking about them.
Those that stay do so for many reasons. Many are tied to the SBC for less than noble reasons and many are tied for the noblest of reasons. Discerning the heart is the purview of the Holy Spirit, and I make no attempts here to do so. Those that do, stumble badly and reveal the deficiencies of their own character more often than anything else.
Among those that are staying, however, there are many who are rising up to be a generation of amazing minds and incredibly forward thinkers.
From my observations, much of this generation eschews the politics of the convention - that is, the manipulative, dirty stuff. I actually know a few who are inside the Convention structure at the state and national level. Mostly, I hear form them that they struggle through meetings because of the politics there, but these meetings are important to them. These folks are willing to go, even when maneuvering gets them down. Why? They want to win the world, and they have this crazy idea that the SBC might help make that happen.
The truth is that while some may be leaving, there is a rich resource of future leadership that is staying. Look at Bob Roberts, Jr., for example. He is the author of Glocalization, his most recent contribution to us. He is Southern Baptist. While not the “up and coming” generation, Roberts has proven to be visionary. Not just that, Roberts is reproducing that vision by taking in those who are interested in training with him to then sending them out to become church planters.
Now, if it is true that not all who eschew politics are leaving, but a generation of forward thinkers are staying in the SBC, then only one thing stands in the way of this group being the defining influence on the SBC in the years to come.
How many are there? Are they a growing group, or the exception to the rule?
When I was in Seminary, a professor told our class that we were in the beginning stages of a paradigm shift from “common sense rationalism” to something as yet undefined. The way that we think, process information, our core values are changing.
When I put the questions above alongside the truth of our paradigm shift, it occurs to me. This must be a growing group. The environment of our learning is changing, never to return. The generations to follow will not be the same, because the world is not the same. To struggle to keep the SBC “the same” or force it to change seems silly to me, all of a sudden. Of course we won’t be the same. It’s not possible.
Look at where we are right now. Most younger leaders grew up in the SBC of the Resurgence. The number of those who now question the direction of the SBC is huge - compared to similar groups of years gone by. What changed? We are conservatives from conservative churches, aren’t we? The thing that changed is the way we process information. What we hold as our core values.
To wrap up this thought, it seems to me, that the future of the SBC is that we will become a more missional denomination, but not because someone wins a “war.” Pardon the military metaphor. We are going to change because young Southern Baptists are going to be different, think differently and do church differently. It is inevitable. Moreover, as years go by, they will grow in number and influence. It can’t be stopped.
This change is not the scheming of a political machine. It is natural. It is organic - not unnaturally shaped by artificial ingredients. It comes from the root of who we really are - or are going to be.
This is not to say that the theological diversity will disappear, nor is it to say that none among us will desire to manipulate the system. There are always those who desire such things - and, as a reminder, I am nt pointing toward one “side.” There are people like this in every group or sub-group.
It is to say, though, that change is coming. It will not need to be organized or politicized. It is organic.
I have hope for our future.