The ABP has an article about Bill Sanderson’s amendment to the Executive Committee’s motion to rephrase by-law 15 (f) concerning Trustee Qualifications.
The article is right about most things, but wrong in its title and in the declaration that the heart of the Executive Committee recommendation had been stripped from the proposal. In fact, only one item was lost – that affecting IMB BOT Chairman John Floyd. The nepotism clause remained intact and in force for all new nominations.
You can read the full story here:
SBC messengers strip much of anti-nepotism motion
![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
jgsy3kids
on Jun 21st, 2006
@ 8:20 pm:
So for clarification; the recommendation did pass that spouses can’t serve at the same time? And if you currently receive money/salary/pension from an entity, you can’t serve under on that entity’s board of trustees?
I thought the whole thing had been killed….I’ll be glad if some of these things remained!
jenni
art rogers
on Jun 21st, 2006
@ 8:25 pm:
Yes, Jenni, all the rest stayed. Only the stuff about being formerly employed was removed from section (f) of by law 15.