<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WMU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wmu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wmu/</link>
	<description>Let these stones be a witness to what we have done here this day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JUSTAMOE</title>
		<link>http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wmu/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>JUSTAMOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/?p=176#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>Art:

Thanks for posting comments as you are and have from the SBC annual meeting.  I&#039;ve been &quot;out of pocket&quot; you know where and doing you know what--but was asked today in the meetings I&#039;m attending, &quot;So, you&#039;re not in NC?&quot;  The person asking wasn&#039;t even an SBC&#039;er, but knows that messengers of the SBC&#039;s churches are meeting in NC this week--and seemed to know how important this year&#039;s meeting is considered among us!

Regarding my &quot;predictions&quot; of last Saturday, posted at your site: As you know, I&#039;m not a prophet or the son of a prophet, or even much of a profit.  While I stand by most of the things predicted--and totally stand by the &quot;sack cloth and ashes&quot; intentions though mentioned in jest, my desire primarily was to cause everyone to think.  I especially wanted/want the &quot;inner circle&quot; type folk who are reading but not posting comments at any of the popular sites to consider carefully/prayerfully what the issues are, and how all of us feel about them.  In the future, the SBC either will be more of a team-effort or it will be very much less effective than it has been (which is not much lately, relative to its size and resources).  And, God doesn&#039;t need the SBC--but He will continue to use us if we remain humble, trusting, and obedient.

As far as I know, I don&#039;t substantially disagree with anything you or any other blog editor has posted since December of last year--and I&#039;m amazed at how the cooperation developed over this length of time between total strangers has become a lesson in itself, whatever the meeting&#039;s outcomes may be.  Others definitely should take note of this.

Everyone, keep up the good work--and invite someone new to participate in Sunday School with you next week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art:</p>
<p>Thanks for posting comments as you are and have from the SBC annual meeting.  I&#8217;ve been &#8220;out of pocket&#8221; you know where and doing you know what&#8211;but was asked today in the meetings I&#8217;m attending, &#8220;So, you&#8217;re not in NC?&#8221;  The person asking wasn&#8217;t even an SBC&#8217;er, but knows that messengers of the SBC&#8217;s churches are meeting in NC this week&#8211;and seemed to know how important this year&#8217;s meeting is considered among us!</p>
<p>Regarding my &#8220;predictions&#8221; of last Saturday, posted at your site: As you know, I&#8217;m not a prophet or the son of a prophet, or even much of a profit.  While I stand by most of the things predicted&#8211;and totally stand by the &#8220;sack cloth and ashes&#8221; intentions though mentioned in jest, my desire primarily was to cause everyone to think.  I especially wanted/want the &#8220;inner circle&#8221; type folk who are reading but not posting comments at any of the popular sites to consider carefully/prayerfully what the issues are, and how all of us feel about them.  In the future, the SBC either will be more of a team-effort or it will be very much less effective than it has been (which is not much lately, relative to its size and resources).  And, God doesn&#8217;t need the SBC&#8211;but He will continue to use us if we remain humble, trusting, and obedient.</p>
<p>As far as I know, I don&#8217;t substantially disagree with anything you or any other blog editor has posted since December of last year&#8211;and I&#8217;m amazed at how the cooperation developed over this length of time between total strangers has become a lesson in itself, whatever the meeting&#8217;s outcomes may be.  Others definitely should take note of this.</p>
<p>Everyone, keep up the good work&#8211;and invite someone new to participate in Sunday School with you next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

