<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wade&#8217;s Motion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wades-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wades-motion/</link>
	<description>Let these stones be a witness to what we have done here this day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianinMO</title>
		<link>http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wades-motion/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianinMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/?p=171#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>I just listened to the debate.  Wade was very well spoken in speaking in favor of the referral, but publicly putting the trustee chairman and all trustees on public notice to seriously seek to address the issues openly and forthrightly. It was shocking to me that Bobby Welch, the moderator, spoke in favor of the referral when he knows the moderator/chair should be as neutral as possible in such a situation. I was watching online, and his body language/facial expressions indicated extreme discomfort with the points being made by those speaking against referral. No one else was making the points he wanted made, so he just did it himself!

Even though it was referred, the IMB trustees are now on the spot to address these issues seriously. If they do not, they will have no reasonable excuses next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just listened to the debate.  Wade was very well spoken in speaking in favor of the referral, but publicly putting the trustee chairman and all trustees on public notice to seriously seek to address the issues openly and forthrightly. It was shocking to me that Bobby Welch, the moderator, spoke in favor of the referral when he knows the moderator/chair should be as neutral as possible in such a situation. I was watching online, and his body language/facial expressions indicated extreme discomfort with the points being made by those speaking against referral. No one else was making the points he wanted made, so he just did it himself!</p>
<p>Even though it was referred, the IMB trustees are now on the spot to address these issues seriously. If they do not, they will have no reasonable excuses next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeneMBridges</title>
		<link>http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/2006/06/13/wades-motion/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>GeneMBridges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twelvewitnesses.com/?p=171#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>They had better realize that if this is not overturned, the nuclear option will be in view, and that will not bode well for the IMB to have all their dirty laundry, names, places, dates, times, etc. named for the whole Convention to observe in all its ignominy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had better realize that if this is not overturned, the nuclear option will be in view, and that will not bode well for the IMB to have all their dirty laundry, names, places, dates, times, etc. named for the whole Convention to observe in all its ignominy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

